Hi everyone, Dr. Love here. Welcome back to LovestbLog, where we start by building ourselves to build better relationships.
Let’s start with a scene I’ve witnessed countless times in my practice. A couple sits on my couch, recounting their latest fight. It started over something small—the dishwasher wasn’t loaded, a text went unanswered. But within minutes, it spiraled. Voices were raised, old wounds were reopened, and one partner eventually shut down completely, leaving the room while the other was left fuming and heartbroken. They both felt misunderstood, unheard, and utterly powerless. Does this sound familiar?
The culprit here isn’t the dishwasher or the text message. It’s a breakdown in one of the most critical skills for relational success: emotional regulation. For years, I’ve guided individuals and couples through this complex landscape, and I’ve found that understanding the “why” behind our reactions is the first, most powerful step toward changing them. So today, we’re going deep. We’re moving beyond platitudes like “just calm down” and building a real, actionable understanding of how to master our emotional world.
Your Brain’s Operating System: What Is Emotional Regulation, Really?
Let’s get one thing straight: emotional regulation is not about getting rid of emotions. That’s suppression, and it’s incredibly destructive. Think of your emotions as the engine of a car—they provide the power, the motivation, the drive. Suppression is like trying to stop a moving car by turning off the engine and hoping for the best. It’s jarring, ineffective, and you’ll likely crash.
Emotional regulation, on the other hand, is learning how to drive the car.[1] It’s the skillful use of the steering wheel, the accelerator, and the brakes to navigate the twists and turns of life. It’s the ability to influence which emotions you have, when you have them, and how you experience and express them.[2] It’s the difference between being a passenger on a runaway emotional train and being the conductor, guiding it with intention.
To truly grasp this, I always introduce my clients to the groundbreaking Process Model developed by Stanford researcher James Gross. It’s a game-changer because it reframes regulation not as a single act, but as a series of opportunities—a timeline where you can intervene.
Gross identifies five families of strategies [3]:
- Situation Selection: Proactively choosing to approach or avoid situations that you know will trigger certain emotions. For example, agreeing with your partner to discuss finances on a calm Sunday afternoon instead of late on a stressful weeknight.[1]
- Situation Modification: Actively changing a situation to alter its emotional impact. If you must attend a family gathering with a difficult relative, you and your partner can agree on a signal to gracefully exit the conversation if it becomes too tense.[4]
- Attentional Deployment: Directing your focus within a situation. When your partner is venting about their bad day, you can choose to focus on their underlying need for support rather than the critical tone in their voice.[4]
- Cognitive Change: Changing how you think about a situation to alter its emotional meaning. This is the home of the powerhouse technique, cognitive reappraisal. Instead of thinking, “They forgot our anniversary because they don’t care,” you can reframe it: “They’ve been under immense pressure at work; this isn’t a reflection of their love for me”.[5]
- Response Modulation: Influencing your emotional response *after* it has already begun. This is where suppression lives—trying to hide your anger or hold back tears after you already feel them welling up.[3]
The most critical distinction here is between Antecedent-Focused Strategies (the first four) and Response-Focused Strategies (the last one). Antecedent strategies intervene *before* the emotion fully takes hold. They are proactive and efficient. Response strategies, like suppression, are reactive. They happen after the emotional engine is already roaring, forcing you to slam on the brakes, which consumes immense cognitive and physiological energy.[6]
The High Cost of “Sucking It Up”: Why Suppression Backfires
For years, many of us were taught that strength means hiding our feelings. But research overwhelmingly shows that suppression is a recipe for personal and relational disaster. When you habitually suppress your emotions, you’re not making them disappear; you’re just trapping them inside a pressure cooker.[7]
Here’s what the science tells us about the fallout:
- Cognitive Cost: Suppression is hard work for your brain. It depletes your mental resources, making it harder to remember what was even said during a conflict and impairing your problem-solving abilities afterward.[5, 8]
- Physiological Cost: While you may look calm on the outside, suppression actually increases your internal physiological arousal. Your heart rate goes up, and brain regions associated with threat, like the amygdala, remain highly active.[9] You’re not calming down; you’re just bottling up a storm.
- Relational Cost: This is the big one for us at LovestbLog. People who habitually suppress emotions are often perceived as less likable and have fewer close relationships. In a romantic partnership, when one person suppresses, both partners report lower relationship satisfaction . It creates a sense of inauthenticity that poisons intimacy.[10]
This makes perfect sense when we look at the brain. Think of your amygdala as your brain’s smoke detector—a fast, primitive alarm system that screams “Threat!” when it perceives danger.[11] Your prefrontal cortex (PFC) is the wise fire chief. It receives the alarm, assesses the situation, and decides on a rational response. Is it just burnt toast, or is the house actually on fire? Effective regulation (like reappraisal) is the fire chief calmly assessing the signal and turning off the alarm. Suppression is the fire chief frantically trying to muffle the blaring alarm while the smoke continues to fill the room. The threat signal doesn’t go away; it just gets louder internally.[12]
When Regulation Fails: Emotional Flooding and The Four Horsemen
So what happens in a relationship when our regulatory skills fail us? We experience what Dr. John Gottman famously calls “emotional flooding.” This is the physiological state of being completely overwhelmed, where your amygdala hijacks your brain.[13] Your heart rate soars above 100 beats per minute, stress hormones flood your system, and your rational mind—the fire chief—goes completely offline. In this state, it is neurobiologically impossible to have a constructive conversation.[14] Your partner is no longer your partner; they are perceived as a threat.
When we’re flooded, we become vulnerable to Gottman’s Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse—four communication patterns that are so toxic they can predict the end of a relationship with startling accuracy . I see these not just as bad habits, but as the direct, observable symptoms of emotional dysregulation.
Let’s break them down, along with their antidotes, which are essentially applied emotional regulation skills.
| The Horseman (The Problem) | What It Sounds Like | The Antidote (The Skill) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Criticism An attack on your partner’s character, rather than a complaint about a specific behavior. |
“You never think about anyone but yourself. You’re so selfish!” | Gentle Start-Up Use an “I” statement to talk about your feelings regarding a specific situation. “I felt hurt and lonely when you were late and didn’t call. I need to know you’re okay.” [15] |
| 2. Contempt The single greatest predictor of divorce. It’s attacking your partner from a place of superiority using sarcasm, mockery, or name-calling. |
(Eye-roll) “Oh, you forgot to take out the trash *again*? What a surprise. I guess I shouldn’t expect you to remember anything.” [15] | Build a Culture of Appreciation Describe your own feelings and needs respectfully. “I know you’ve been swamped, but when I see the trash overflowing, I feel overwhelmed. I would really appreciate it if you could handle it.” |
| 3. Defensiveness Seeing yourself as the victim to ward off a perceived attack. It’s a way of blaming your partner. |
“It’s not my fault! You’re the one who distracted me when I was about to do it.” | Take Responsibility Accept even a small part of the responsibility for the conflict. “You’re right, I did get distracted and forgot. That’s on me. I’ll take it out now.” [15] |
| 4. Stonewalling Withdrawing from the interaction to avoid conflict. The listener shuts down and stops responding. This is often a response to feeling flooded. |
(Silence, avoiding eye contact, turning away, acting busy.) | Physiological Self-Soothing Recognize you’re flooded and call a timeout. “I’m feeling too overwhelmed to talk about this right now. Can we please take a 20-minute break and come back to it?” [15] |
Your Toolkit for Change: Practical Skills from CBT and DBT
Understanding the theory is enlightening, but true mastery comes from practice. In my work, I draw heavily from two powerful therapeutic models that provide concrete tools for building regulation skills.
1. For Long-Term Rewiring: Cognitive Restructuring (from CBT)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is built on a simple premise: our thoughts create our feelings . To change how you feel, you must change how you think. The core skill here is cognitive restructuring, which is a more clinical term for the “cognitive change” strategy we discussed earlier.
It’s about catching your automatic, often distorted, thoughts in the heat of the moment and challenging them .
- Step 1: Identify the Triggering Thought. Your partner is quiet during dinner. Your automatic thought is: “They’re mad at me. I did something wrong.”
- Step 2: Challenge That Thought. Is there any other possible explanation? Is it 100% true?
- Step 3: Reframe It. Replace the initial thought with a more balanced, less emotionally charged one. For example, instead of thinking, “They are doing this on purpose to irritate me,” you can consciously shift to, “This may not be intentional, and I can choose how I respond” . This simple reframe creates the mental space needed to prevent emotional escalation.
2. For Surviving the Storm: Distress Tolerance Skills (from DBT)
But what about when you’re already flooded? When your heart is pounding and you can’t think straight? That’s where Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) comes in. DBT offers a set of crisis survival skills designed to get you through intense moments without making things worse.[16]
My go-to recommendation for couples is the TIPP skill, designed to rapidly change your body’s physiology [17]:
- Temperature: Splash your face with cold water or hold an ice pack. This triggers the “dive reflex,” which quickly slows your heart rate.
- Intense Exercise: Do jumping jacks or run in place for a minute. This burns off the adrenaline fueling your fight-or-flight response.
- Paced Breathing: Slow your breathing way down. Breathe in for four seconds, and out for six. This tells your nervous system that the threat has passed.
- Progressive Muscle Relaxation: Tense and then release different muscle groups, from your toes to your face, to release physical tension.
These aren’t long-term solutions, but they are incredibly effective emergency brakes to pull when you feel yourself spinning out of control. They give your prefrontal cortex—your inner fire chief—a chance to come back online.
The Path Forward: Regulation as a Relational Practice
Mastering emotional regulation is not a one-time fix; it’s a lifelong practice. It’s about shifting from a mindset of blame and reactivity to one of awareness and intention. It’s recognizing that your emotions are valid signals, but they don’t have to be in the driver’s seat.
The most successful couples I’ve worked with are the ones who make this a shared journey. They learn to recognize the signs of flooding in each other. They agree on a timeout signal. They practice gentle start-ups and celebrate small wins. They transform conflict from a battlefield into a classroom for mutual understanding and growth.
This is the heart of our work at LovestbLog—building ourselves first. By developing your own emotional regulation toolkit, you not only enhance your own well-being but also give the greatest possible gift to your relationship: a partner who is present, intentional, and capable of navigating life’s storms, together.
Now, I’d love to hear from you. Which of the Four Horsemen shows up most often in your conflicts, and what’s one small step you could take this week to practice its antidote?